Piper Shogren's Musings & Aspirations in Ecofeminism

Ecofeminist philosophy argues the oppressions of women and environment are inherently linked, requiring theory, practice, and solutions to consider the complexities of both issues together. The attached image portrays the fairytale, Little Red Riding Hood. Though many retellings exist, they share a young girl preyed upon by a (personified) male wolf. According to Hobgood-Oster, “ecofeminism claims that patriarchal structures justify their dominance through categorical or dualistic hierarchies: heaven/earth, mind/body, male/female, human/animal, spirit/matter, culture/nature, white/non-white” (2). The aforementioned fairy tale is a curious specimen under an ecofeminist lens—artistic analysis of Betidraws’ depiction offers greater depth to ecofeminist theory.

Ecofeminism considers male oppression of women and nature inherently linked. This duality of societal structure reinforces patriarchy and systems of oppression (Hobgood-Oster 2,3). From this perspective, ecofeminists believe “all dualisms and binary oppositional forms must be dismantled otherwise humanity remains ‘divided against’ itself” (Hobgood-Oster 3). Dualisms present in the image, and the Little Red Riding Hood tale, itself, come from the artist’s color palette, depth, and theme, accenting menacing, masculine dominance over a vulnerable female and nature. Warm and cool hues outline the difference between femininity and masculinity. Shades of red and yellow bring warmth to small, “weaker” figures, such as flowers and Red Riding Hood herself. Meanwhile, cooler colors (grey and dark green) define powerful figures within the painting—the silhouette of a predatory wolf, or towering trees, with razor-edged branches. The wolf looms over the young girl, like men assert power over women. Red Riding Hood’s depiction is also significant. Her dress is red like flowers in the foreground, comparing flora (dainty and beautiful) with women to accent their vulnerability in the presence of danger. Her golden-yellow hair echoes the sky’s color, implying women should be “warm” like the sun. In the upper-right-hand corner, bright, white light emanates from behind the wolf’s back. Its shape recalls a woman in a dress, with the wolf carrying her, reinforcing a theme of women’s victimization.

Artistic decisions regarding depth offer a perspective where women are small, compared to larger threats, and nature is vulnerable to men’s destruction. Both the girl’s and wolf’s shadows extend outward to the audience. Her shadow spreads over ground in the bottom center of the picture, while the wolf’s exaggerated silhouette devours a mass of central canvas area. According to Hobgood-Oster, some early ecofeminist academia “proposed that patriarchal cultural structures revolved around layers of symbol systems that justified domination” (Hobgood-Oster 4). In Betidraws’ art, the wolf’s shadow is as tall as, if not taller than, some trees, obscuring realism to portray the (male) wolf as greater, or more powerful, than a lone woman. Further, depletion of foliage—naked trees at center, despite lushness in the foreground bottom corners, suggests the looming figure’s (a.k.a. man’s) violence, harming women and nature. To note, because shadows spread to the foreground (advancing toward the viewer), the painting’s light source (in nature, the sun) must come from the center-right, to the back of the painting (behind the wolf’s shadow). A triangular patch of white appears within the curves of the wolf’s shadow. The top of this silhouette resembles a woman’s dress, as curved edges between the wolf’s silhouette outline her long hair (to the left) and her shoulder or chest (in white curves between the three claws). These edges are also similar in shape to a pine tree’s branches (as in the painting’s background). The shadow could be both tree and woman, as men’s destruction of nature (deforestation) is akin to their abuse of women.

Masculine violence against women and nature is a shared theme in the artwork, fairy-tale, and real life. Hobgood-Oster states, “feminine language used for ‘nature’ and the parallel violent approaches of control assigned against unruly nature and unruly women are obvious” (Hobgood-Oster 8). When men/patriarchy equate(s) women with nature, they devalue both, rather than recognizing the inherent value of each. Perrault’s version of the “Little Red Riding Hood” tale states, “who does not know that these gentle wolves are of all such creatures the most dangerous!” (“Little Red Riding Hood”). In the artist’s depiction, portraying the wolf with more masculine, bulky size (compared to the stick-thin shape both Red Riding Hood and nature—distant trees, flowers—share) leaves the girl and nature vulnerable to attack/destruction. Even friendlier retellings include a male hunter/lumberjack who saves the women, despite his prior violent destruction of nature. Thus, in depictions of the old fairy tale, whether male characters are hero or villain, they remain a threat to the environment, and women.

Works Cited

Betidraws. “Little Red Riding Hood Wolf.” Pixabay. 29 December 2024. Web. pixabay.com/illustrations/little-red-riding-hood-wolf-forest-9296256/. Accessed 28 January 2025.

Hobgood-Oster, Laura. “Ecofeminism: Historic and International Evolution.” The Encyclopedia of Religion and Nature edited by Bron Taylor; Southwestern University, Georgetown, Texas; University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth, myCourses, WGS 307-7101: Ecofeminism: Philosophy & Practice – On-Line (2025 Spring CE1). 2006, 2010. Web. systemicalternatives.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/ecofeminism.pdf. Accessed 28 January 2025.

McHenry, Kristen Abatsis, Dr. “Week 2 Learning Module: What is Ecofeminism?” University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth, myCourses, WGS 307-7101: Ecofeminism: Philosophy & Practice – On-Line (2025 Spring CE1). n.d. umassd.umassonline.net/ultra/courses/_36339_1/cl/outline. Accessed 28 January 2025.

n.a., “Little Red Riding Hood.” Wikipedia. 27 January 2025. Web. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Red_Riding_Hood#Plot. Accessed 28 January 2025.

n.a., “Charles Perrault.” Wikipedia. 11 November 2024. Web. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Perrault. Accessed 28 January 2025.

 

Hello all,

My name is Piper, and I use she/they pronouns. I am a Women, Gender, and Sexuality Studies major at UMass-Dartmouth. I reside in Minnesota with my parents. Beyond my classwork, I have two part-time jobs: I am a music lesson teacher, and a cashier.

After some exploration, I chose to reflect on the feminist blog, Women’s Media Center (WMC). One particular page of this blog was entitled, “WMC FBomb,” and is described as “an intersectional teen feminist media platform created by and for socially conscious youth” (WMC). On the surface, the greatest reason this blog would not model my own work is that multiple authors curate the blog, whereas my work would solely reflect my views. Diving deeper, this blog contains posts on a variety of themes (ranging from gender-based violence, to gender identity, to poetry.) My blog, on the other hand, would have a significant focus on the relationship between women and the environment (hence, ecofeminism) and the work I wish to do in furthering an inclusive/diverse society, while also respecting the environment which supports us all.

As a side note: I was intrigued by a post from Jessica Sennett, in which she relayed the impact writing poetry had on her. Sennett engaged in a slam poetry night, and in her words, “I picked poems that I was yearning for the world to hear (topics included gun control and the patriarchy, of course)” (Sennett). Having studied intersectionality and standpoint theory in previous classes, I believe there are many issues which overlap in people’s lives, and we all interact with them differently. Given this focus, I believe my blog will act, for me, as poetry does for Sennett: to provide an outlet where I may share my perspective on prominent issues to begin making a change.

One such issue relevant to where I live is the presence of harmful Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAs), long-lasting materials resistant to “heat, water, and oil” which “harm human health,” and “are linked to a variety of adverse health conditions and illnesses” (Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy, MCEA). While these chemicals were used to enhance consumer products, they are linked to conditions such as cancer and infant mortality. As these chemicals do not break down over time, and cause harm, “even at extremely low concentrations,” their continued use (and careless disposal) shows a lack of regard for human and environmental health (MCEA). As examples, “St. Louis and Olmsted counties have fish consumption advisories due to PFAS contamination” (MCEA). But this issue is not limited to Minnesota, nor is it new. As a matter of fact, as I learned in a previous class, “though the 

U.S. government didn’t recognize PFOA as a dangerous chemical, both DuPont and 3M knew it was potentially toxic” (Tran 8:48). DuPont had even “classified PFOA as a confirmed animal carcinogen, possible human carcinogen” (Soechtig 45:42). As my blog expands, with the inclusion of further ecofeminist concepts, I will analyze how systems of oppression are furthered by the cultural norm of devaluing nature. And, I hope the written expression of my ideas and learning will encourage and guide me to the activism I want to partake of in the future. Further, I hope my work will encourage others so we may work together to improve this world for everyone. I hope to develop an informative and influential place where my desire for both environmental balance and social diversity encourage real change, as I learn to put theory into practice.

Image by tsaloka from Pixabay

Image by Eva Michálková from Pixabay

Work Cited

Sennett, Jessica. “The Power of Poetry for Teenage Girls.” WMC FBOMB: Arts and Culture, Women’s Media Center (WMC). 12 December 2023. Web. womensmediacenter.com/fbomb/the-power-of-poetry-for-teenage-girls. Accessed 24 January 2025.

The Devil We Know. Directed by Stephanie Soechtig, Atlas Films, 2018. Web.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJFbsWX4MJM. Accessed 24 January 2025.

Tran, Jake. “DuPont: The Most Evil Business in the World.” YouTube, uploaded by Jake Tran, 22 November 2021. Web. www.youtube.com/watch?v=-pW2ATrDnA8. Accessed 24 January 2025.

n.a.1 “WMC FBOMB.” Women’s Media Center (WMC). 5 October 2023, 2025. Web. womensmediacenter.com/fbomb/. Accessed 24 January 2025.

n.a.2 “Toxic Chemicals: Defending Minnesotans’ Health from ‘Forever Chemicals’.” Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy (MCEA). n.d. Web. www.mncenter.org/defending-minnesotans-health-forever-chemicals. Accessed 24 January 2025.